Amber Heard’s insurer refuses to pay out Johnny Depp damages due to ‘wilful’ defamation-Tori Brazier-Entertainment – Metro

The actress is facing a challenge from her insurance providers (Picture: Ron Sachs/Consolidated News Pictures/Getty Images)

Amber Heard’s insurance company don’t want to pay her damages to Johnny Depp, it’s been reported.

The Aquaman actress was ordered to pay her ex-husband Depp $15million (£12m) in compensatory and punitive damages after a jury in Virginia ruled she had defamed him when she wrote an article in 2018 about being a victim of domestic abuse.

Heard won one count of her $100m (£83m) countersuit, and was given damages of $2m (£1.6m), with her current tally to pay the 59-year-old totalling over $8m (£6.6m).

The 36-year-old was subsequently hoping her $1m liability policy with New York Marine and General Insurance Co would see her not having to foot the bill.

However, while the policy covers various types of wrongful conduct, including defamation, TMZ noted that under California law, which governs the policy, an insurance company is not liable to pay if the insured party committed wrongful, wilful misconduct.

The firm noted that not only did the jury find Amber had committed wilful defamation, it was also deemed to be malicious.

Amber was found guilty of defaming ex-husband Johnny Depp in a jury trial in June (Picture: Cliff Owen/Consolidated News Pictures/Getty Images)

The couple together in 2011, in London for the European premiere of their film together The Rum Diary (Picture: AP)

New York Marine are now seeking a declaration from the judge that, based on the policy and the law, they are not responsible to pay the damages for the Danish Girl star.

Meanwhile, Amber’s lawyers are asking the court to declare a ‘mistrial’ after losing the defamation case, amid claims of a juror ‘error’.

Deadline reported that a 77-year-old individual was called up for jury duty but appears to live at the same address as a 52-year-old with ‘the same surname’, who was the juror actually seated throughout the trial, according to the actress’s legal team’s filing.

Amber recently admitted she could understand why people might dismiss her and her ex-husband as ‘Hollywood brats’ for taking their differences to trial, but she insisted there was much more to the case than a former couple airing their dirty laundry in public.

Aquaman star Amber spoke out after the court ruling in a television interview (Picture: Today/NBC)

Speaking to NBC Today journalist Savannah Guthrie during her first TV interview after losing the court battle, she admitted: ‘I would not blame the average person for looking at this and how this has been covered and thinking that this is Hollywood brats at their worst.

‘But what people don’t understand is that it is actually so much bigger than that. This is not only about our First Amendment right to speak.’

The 36-year-old star also said she was astounded by the ‘vitriol’ aimed at her on social media, and she went on to claim she saw Johnny’s fans lining the streets outside the courtroom holding signs with death threats on them.

More: Trending

‘Every single day I passed three, four, sometimes six city blocks lined with people holding signs saying ‘Burn the witch’ and ‘Death to Amber’,’ she claimed.

‘After three-and-a-half weeks I took the stand and saw a courtroom packed full of Captain Jack Sparrow fans who were vocal, energised.’

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

MORE : Netflix will stream Johnny Depp’s first film after trial as actor stars in La Favorite

MORE : Johnny Depp donates $800,000 to various children’s hospitals through NFT sales

Entertainment – MetroRead More