Fashion
I spent £35 on the Kim Kardashian’s Skims shorts – they made it hard to breathe and didn’t even help my figure
A WOMAN was left disappointed after ordering shapewear from Skims.
Georgia Peach, from the US, who now lives in the UK, was initially excited to try Kim Kardashian‘s line of shapewear.
Georgia Peach wanted to see if the Skims shapewear would work on her thighsTiktok/@yorkshirepeach
She spent £35 on the Sculpting shorts which she was already not impressed with.
Georgia said: “I paid £35 for them, that’s more then I like to pay for anything like this that nobody’s going to see but they’re meant to hold you in.”
She explained her problem area was her thighs and was curious to see if there was any different.
In the TikTok video, Georgia first tried on a pair of black suit trousers without the Skims on.
READ MORE FASHION STORIES
BRAVELLOUS
I’m a fashion fan and this is my bra hack – you’ll never see bra straps again
Shop horror
I’m a size 12 and this is how much clothes vary between shops
Georgia ordered the shorts in a large which fits a UK size 12/14, and was shocked by how tiny they looked.
While trying to get the shorts on Georgia revealed she’d broken a sweat trying to get them on because they were so tight.
After getting the Skims on Georgia put her trousers on for the big reveal to see if they had made any differnece.
“I feel like it’s the same, I don’t think these pants are doing anything for me, Skims or no Skims,” she added.
Most read in Fabulous
TATT’S BAD
I got a cute tattoo in Thailand… two years later & it looks totally different
NAILED IT
I wanted to get a French mani but it’s so bad – my nails look like Squashies
KEEP COOL
Woman shows off DIY £20 swimming pool she made to survive the heatwave
CONFIDENT CURVES
I’m a size 24 & wear THONG bikinis – people stare but that’s the norm
SHOCK BABIES
I was terrified when I fell pregnant at 46, I never thought I’d have kids
DIS-DRESS
Woman flogs her ‘mother of the groom’ dress online – but people are fuming
“£35 pounds? I can’t breathe very well,” she continued.
Georgia ended the video saying that she didn’t think the pants were the right style for her and that the Skims had done nothing to cinch in her thighs.
Viewers of the video agreed there was a slight difference, but that it wasn’t worth £35.
One wrote: “Can see a tiny difference but defo not worth £35 and your ability to breathe.”
Another commented: “I think a slight difference but whether it’s worth £35 I dunno!!”
A third penned: “Not worth the money at all. they seem very uncomfy and barely any difference.”
Tiktok/@yorkshirepeachMost people agreed the price tag wasn’t worth it[/caption]
A WOMAN was left disappointed after ordering shapewear from Skims.
Georgia Peach, from the US, who now lives in the UK, was initially excited to try Kim Kardashian‘s line of shapewear.
Georgia Peach wanted to see if the Skims shapewear would work on her thighsTiktok/@yorkshirepeach
She spent £35 on the Sculpting shorts which she was already not impressed with.
Georgia said: “I paid £35 for them, that’s more then I like to pay for anything like this that nobody’s going to see but they’re meant to hold you in.”
She explained her problem area was her thighs and was curious to see if there was any different.
In the TikTok video, Georgia first tried on a pair of black suit trousers without the Skims on.
READ MORE FASHION STORIES
Georgia ordered the shorts in a large which fits a UK size 12/14, and was shocked by how tiny they looked.
While trying to get the shorts on Georgia revealed she’d broken a sweat trying to get them on because they were so tight.
After getting the Skims on Georgia put her trousers on for the big reveal to see if they had made any differnece.
“I feel like it’s the same, I don’t think these pants are doing anything for me, Skims or no Skims,” she added.
Most read in Fabulous
“£35 pounds? I can’t breathe very well,” she continued.
Georgia ended the video saying that she didn’t think the pants were the right style for her and that the Skims had done nothing to cinch in her thighs.
Viewers of the video agreed there was a slight difference, but that it wasn’t worth £35.
One wrote: “Can see a tiny difference but defo not worth £35 and your ability to breathe.”
Another commented: “I think a slight difference but whether it’s worth £35 I dunno!!”
A third penned: “Not worth the money at all. they seem very uncomfy and barely any difference.”
Tiktok/@yorkshirepeachMost people agreed the price tag wasn’t worth it[/caption]Fashion – latest style news and Fabulous trends | The Sun
