Dark Souls would’ve benefitted from early access says No Rest For The Wicked dev-Adam Starkey-Entertainment – Metro

No Rest For The Wicked has started an early access debate (Picture: Moon Studios)

Moon Studios CEO Thomas Mahler has defended releasing games in early access, stating that it allows developers to ‘truly perfect a product over time’.

More and more games have been released in early access over the past decade, in order to test a product and grow a fanbase before it is officially launched in a complete state.

While there’s some questionable ethics in selling an unfinished product, the early access model has proven to be successful for many PC-orientated titles, such as Baldur’s Gate 3, Dead Cells, Vampire Survivors and Darkest Dungeon.

One of the latest teams to utilise the model, Ori developer Moon Studios, has defended the concept, after some players complained about performance issues in their latest game No Rest For The Wicked, which launched in early access last week.

‘We’re not even a week into early access and it’s already pretty clear going with EA [early access] is one of the best decisions we could’ve made,’ Moon Studios CEO, Thomas Mahler, wrote in a lengthy post on Twitter.

‘I see some people are still irked about why games like Wicked, Hades 2, Larian’s new game, etc., launch into early access even if the studio ‘should have the funds to finish the game and release it then’. But that’s looking at a complex problem through a way too simple lens.’

Mahler believes early access will become more prevalent as games ‘become more and more complex and sophisticated’, adding that there is ‘no way’ they could have shipped the full version of No Rest For The Wicked without the data and feedback the team is ‘seeing now’.

‘Even if we’d have two to three times the staff, it would have been quite simply impossible, the product is just way too complex of a beast to reasonably expect that,’ Mahler said. ‘Nine women can’t make a baby in a month and all that.’

The developer goes one step further and claims even past games would have benefitted from the early access model, citing FromSoftware’s Dark Souls as a specific example.

‘And even historically speaking, I think some games would’ve benefitted from early access even before EA was a thing,’ he added. ‘Imagine [if] Dark Souls 1 would’ve been in early access – instead of From [Software] rushing to ship a boxed product in a somewhat unfinished state, they probably would’ve been able to look at the second half of that game and still fully form and polish the less polished areas like Lost Izalith, etc.’

After disregarding the idea that these improvements can be made through post-launch updates and DLC, Mahler said: ‘Shipping games is always incredibly difficult and stressful and most of the time it means making quite drastic compromises, especially if your product is trying to accomplish something new. And if you don’t know that it’s okay to bring in certain features and scope after the fact, you’ll just end up cutting before you hit the market.

Would Dark Souls be better if it had been in early access? (Picture: FromSoftware)

‘So, even if you dislike the idea of early access: It’s one way to allow developers to truly perfect a product over time, so please try to understand that there’s value in that.’

In a follow-up tweet, Mahler encouraged PlayStation and Nintendo to embrace the early access model. ‘The industry is just changing at a rapid pace and holding on to things that were the norm 5-10 years ago is too restrictive,’ he added.

‘Ultimately, people just want to play great games. It shouldn’t matter how the game was developed, just that it was and if players can’t play some great experience on your platform, you’re doing your audience a disservice.’

While the early access model is certainly valid, and especially helpful for developers, it’s a model which can be easily exploited – as seen in the case of The Day Before which was accused of being a scam for not fulfilling its original promise.

Calling out Nintendo is a stretch too, considering Zelda: Tears Of The Kingdom launched without a single notable bug, after a year of QA and polishing.

More Trending

Read More Stories

It certainly seems like more developers are seeing early access as an essential crutch though. Larian’s director of publishing, Michael Douse, recently told Game File that early access ‘is the only way to do it now’ in regards to the studio’s future games.

Douse, however, stressed that early access isn’t suitable for every game: ‘If you don’t know how to do early access, I wouldn’t do early access, but if you are interested in creating a really strong core gameplay loop and then building around that, to foster a strong community, that’s a really good way to do it. It’s probably the best way to do it.’

No Rest For The Wicked is Moon Studios’ first experiment with early access, after their two previous games Ori And The Blind Forest and Ori And The Will Of The Wisps.

Email gamecentral@metro.co.uk, leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter, and sign-up to our newsletter.

MORE : MediEvil 2 and Gravity Rush 2 remakes rumoured for PlayStation Showcase

MORE : Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 announce trailer confirms 2024 release

MORE : Baldur’s Gate dev Larian is working on two new games and neither are licences

Follow Metro Gaming on Twitter and email us at gamecentral@metro.co.uk

To submit Inbox letters and Reader’s Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here.

For more stories like this, check our Gaming page.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.Entertainment – MetroRead More