Connect with us

Entertainment

Gladiator II isn’t a masterpiece but you’ll like Ridley Scott’s sequel anyway-Tori Brazier-Entertainment – Metro

You will be entertained… mostly.

Gladiator II isn’t a masterpiece but you’ll like Ridley Scott’s sequel anyway-Tori Brazier-Entertainment – Metro

Sir Ridley Scott’s return to Rome is bold and absorbing – but not perfect (Picture: Aidan Monaghan/Paramount Pictures via AP)

Gladiator II, a sequel that debuts nearly a quarter of a century after the original, is a bold, truly epic return to where filmmaker Sir Ridley Scott first made mega fans with Russell Crowe’s quest for vengeance against a corrupt emperor.

But I’d hesitate to call it a masterpiece, as breathless first reactions did on social media.

Director Scott has clearly thought a lot about the Roman Empire in the last 24 years, being sensitive to the pitfalls of following up such a popular film with a sequel that might dent its legacy.

Gladiator II by no means tarnishes the reputation of what came before it – but there are a handful of stumbles that drew awkward laughter at my screening, mainly when screenwriter David Scarpa and Scott are too heavy handed with the links to the first film.

The story which Scott eventually settled on for his return to Rome – penned by Scarpa from an idea by him and Peter Craig – is well-crafted in its motives and action, following similar beats to that of Crowe’s Maximus Decimus Meridius. A gifted warrior is taken into slavery following the murder of his wife and child by invading Roman forces. 

What’s different this time is the warrior is Lucius (Paul Mescal), secret son of Maximus and late emperor Marcus Aurelius’s daughter Lucilla, who is living in hiding in Numidia. And the general leading the army, Marcus Acacius (Pedro Pascal), trained under Maximus – and is now married to Lucilla. Juicy.

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video

Up Next

Lucius’s arc as a captive follows a similar path to that of his father’s, showing his gifted ways with brutal combat early on until he is a respected gladiator sent out to fight to the death in the Colosseum during a festival, more than once.

Mescal is thoroughly believable as Lucius, capable and keeping the eddy of his fury just beneath the surface of his performance. He proves a commendable leading man but sometimes feels a bit underdeveloped by the script and emotionally constipated. The wild swing in his change of behaviour toward Lucilla in two separate encounters is an example of where it feels like they hacked away a bit too much at his character in the edits.

Will you be watching Gladiator 2?Comment Now

Alongside the twang of bowstrings and roaring explosions of catapult bombs in Gladiator II, a deliciously old-school sword and sandal film-esque from Scott, there’s also no shortage of blood spraying. Gladiators are gorily dispatched via rhino horn, beheading, gnashing shark jaws and terrifyingly bloodthirsty baboons – we’ve upgraded from Maximus’s tigers here.

The film’s creative interpretation of accuracy has also started making headlines with some of the more ‘cinematic’ choices that Scott has made, but this has never bothered him before in his bid to deliver entertainment to fans. A perfect example of this is Emperor Geta (Joseph Quinn), who co-rules with his syphilis-ridden brother Caracalla (Fred Hechinger), doubling down on the reversed thumbs up and down ruling in the arena. Scott is unrepentant in the inaccuracy pedalled by the first film – and I admire that.

Gladiator II follows similar beats to the first film with Paul Mescal’s journey as Lucius (Picture: Paramount/Everett/Rex/Shutterstock)

The scale is up a notch, with mutltiple arena fights and deadly opponents (Picture: Alamy Stock Photo)

Quinn is beautifully intense as Geta, forming a debauched and corrupt ruling force with a brother so addled that his pet monkey is given insultingly high status. While not as formidable a force as Commodus in Gladiator, who was only too happy to murder his father, these two demonstrate a grotesque reality of the excesses of Rome.

They also allow space for the machinations of the true villain of the piece – though you’ll love him – Denzel Washington’s Macrinus, a former slave turned arms dealer and gladiator owner, who mentors Lucius. He has ambitions of his own to control Rome, aside from the senatorial plot that Lucilla and Acacius are involved with that seeks to end the empire’s war mongering and vice – he’s not bothered by any sort of conscience, as his shocking actions prove.

Such audacious behaviour makes Macrinus sure to be a moustache-twirling, fan-favourite baddie for the ages. Washington’s unique reading of the line ‘my friend is politicssss’ will be the quote of the film.

The Training Day star is just so good, so supremely confident and charismatic, so over-the-top that I would love to see another Oscar come his way. Gladiator II is undeniably his movie, but I wonder if he’s having too much fun for the Academy to award his performance?

Denzel Washington is the stand-out as Macrinus, charismatic and ambitious, chewing all the scenery in sight (Picture: Paramount Pictures)

Gladiator II has some issues, but no one else is making epic movies like Sir Ridley Scott (Picture: Aidan Monaghan/Paramount Pictures via AP)

The downside is his marvellous scenery chewing can make Pedro’s Acacius and Connie Nielsen as Lucilla seem rather deadly serious – as their plight is – but it’s a bit like they’re acting in different films sometimes. It’s not helped either by those embarrassingly on-the-nose decisions mentioned earlier that undermine the urgency of their scenes, such as a very unsubtle Roman statue and a servant extra lurking with extreme obviousness. You’ll spot them.

Gladiator II’s climax also seems to come not once but twice, with Mescal making more than one stirring speech to the masses, which he does with aplomb, but indicates some trimming of the 148-minute runtime could have helped.

The historic kiss that never was

Denzel Washington, who plays the scheming Macrinus in Gladiator II, has revealed that a kiss he had with another man in the film was cut, leaving him devastated.

Among the violent retribution and clashing power plays, Macrinus’ past relationships with men are mentioned – a common enough occurrence during this time and culture.

But when asked about how gay the Roman Empire is in a recent interview, the acclaimed actor delivered some tough news.

‘I actually kissed a man in the film but they took it out, they cut it, I think they got chicken,’ he said.

Going into more detail, the 69-year-old actor added to Gayety: ‘I kissed a guy full on the lips and I guess they weren’t ready for that yet. I killed him about five minutes later. It’s Gladiator. It’s the kiss of death.’

However, the ambitious scope of the film and the effort that has gone into it is quite something to behold – nobody else is making movies like this anymore. I may have quibbles but Gladiator 2 is compelling and, most importantly, entertaining.

While it doesn’t reach the dizzying heights of the first Gladiator, held by many moviegoing fans in very high esteem, it has lots to admire. And am I already ready to watch it again? Absolutely.

Gladiator 2 is out in UK cinemas now. It will be released in the US on November 22.

This review previously ran on Metro on November 11.

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

Entertainment – MetroRead More